BMA granted permission to judicially review UK government

Back To Latest News

Directions were issued last year to address the unlawful discrimination the courts previously found to have been introduced to public service pension schemes.

Under the 2021 directions, the costs of remedying the government’s discrimination are to be passed on to pension scheme members.

The BMA has mounted a judicial review on the basis that the directions:

  • are contrary to the government’s own guidance and policies relating to the cost control mechanism and the valuation of the pension schemes;
  • involved a failure to adequately consult on the directions and obtain and take into account relevant information impacting on its decision to include the full costs of the remedying the discrimination as member costs; and
  • are in breach of the public sector equality duty.

Simon Ramsden, from Capital Law’s Public Law & Regulatory team, is working  with Fenella Morris QC and Jennifer Thelen from 39 Essex Chambers, to represent the BMA in this judicial challenge.

The case has wider implications for the funding and valuation of public service pension schemes and retirement benefits. A related claim brought by the Fire Brigades Union and supported by several public service trade unions will be heard together with the BMA’s case in the High Court.